Managerial bureaucracy becomes abusive to the engineer class (1940-1970)
As of 1932, the majority of these corporations were, in all practicality, no longer controlled by their majority shareholders, classified by economists as “management-controlled.” The management fad which became known as “separation of ownership and control” spread throughout the major public corporations.
The moral hazards of management-controlled companies became increasingly obvious as the 1930s wore on. Management-controlled companies were run by executives which, despite not owning many shares, eventually achieved “self-perpetuating positions of control” of policies, because they are able to manipulate the boards of directors through proxies and majority shareholder votes. These machinations sometimes created high levels of conflict. In the early 1940s, the idea emerged that this structural divide in the corporate world was being mimicked in the social and political worlds, with a distinct elite “management class” emerging in society.
Institutional economists drew a distinction between the management class and the class of “technical operators” (the people doing the work, in many cases engineers and technicians). The managerial elite consisted of the “analysts” or “specialists” who acted as the bureaucratic planners, budgetary allocators, and non-technical managers.
A strange power dynamic emerged between the analysts and the technical staff in the computer companies which had emerged between 1957 and 1969; this dynamic was studied by industrial economists in both the UK and US. They found that the analysts jockeyed for power, creating conflict. They won favor and influence over the company by expanding their divisions, creating opportunities to hire more direct reports, or to win a new promotion, a tactic known as “‘empire building.” The overall effect on the organization was misallocation of resources and incredible pressure to grow. Sales and development cycles were persistently rushed. The computer analysts’ slogan became, ‘if it works, it’s obsolescent.’” The analysts had ‘a vested interest in change.’”
This dynamic had created dysfunction. Managers used a variety of social tactics to enforce their will and agenda, in spite of technical realities, reflecting Veblen’s observation about “ceremonial” institutions 75 years before. Documented tactics included:
Organizational inertia:
New and threatening ideas are blocked with advice “idea killers" including: "the boss won't like it," "it's not policy," "I don't have the authority," "it's never been tried," "we've always done it that way," and "why change something that works?"
Budget games:
“Foot in the door,” where a new program is sold in modestly, concealing its real magnitude; “Hidden ball,” where a politically unattractive program is concealed within an attractive one; “Divide and conquer,” where approval of a budget request is sought from more than one supervisor; “It's free,” where it is argued that someone else will pay for the project so the organization might as well approve it; “Razzle-dazzle,” where a request is supported with voluminous data, but arranged in such a way that their significance is not clear; “Delayed Buck,” where deliverables are submitted late, with the argument that the budget guidelines require too much detailed calculation; and many others.
These tales from the 1960s anticipate the emergence of the popular cartoon Dilbert in the 1990s, which skewered absurd managerial behavior. Its author, Scott Adams, had worked as a computer programmer and manager at Pacific Bell from 1986 to 1995.
Group identity develops amongst professional technologists (1980-2000)
The dictatorial behavior of the management class belied the true balance of power in technical organizations.
In the 1980s, the entire weight of many industrial giants rested upon its technologists. But their role put them in a strange position, at odds with the rest of their organization. Placed at the margins of the organization, closest to the work, they were removed from the C-suite and its power plays. Not working with executives directly, the technologists identified far less with the heads of the company than the managers, who directly reported to C-suite.
The technologists’ work was enjoyable to them, but opaque to the rest of the organization. A power dynamic emerged between the technical operators and the rest of the company; their projects were difficult to supervise, and proceeded whimsically, in ways that reflected the developers’ own interests.
Their power to work this way originated in their critical skills. These skills act as a wedge within organizations, earning technical operators considerable freedom of direction. The efficacy of this wedge increased when the technical operator provided a skill which was in great demand, affording them job mobility. In this instance, their dependence on the organization was reduced. Company ideology was typically not a strong force amongst technologists, in comparison to “professional ideology,” or the belief in the profession and its norms. The elite technologists were becoming outsiders within their own companies.
Instead of loyalty to company or CEO, technologists developed, as a professional goal, loyalty to the end-user or client. A company’s technologists were focused on the needs of the existing customer, while the analysts and managers (whose work did not deal directly with the end-user) supported more abstract goals like efficiency and growth.
The hacker movement emerges
The hacker movement had originated amongst software-makers at MIT in the 1960s. Perhaps seen as an antidote to the managerial dysfunction inside the older corporate tech companies, the hacker movement’s focus on practical, useful, and excellent software spread rapidly across the country in the 1980s and 1990s. MIT software activist Richard Stallman described hackers as playful but diligent problem-solvers who prided themselves on their individual ingenuity:
“What they had in common was mainly love of excellence and programming. They wanted to make their programs that they used be as good as they could. They also wanted to make them do neat things. They wanted to be able to do something in a more exciting way than anyone believed possible and show ‘Look how wonderful this is. I bet you didn't believe this could be done.’ Hackers don’t want to work, they want to play.”
At a conference in 1984, a hacker who had gone to work at Apple to build the Macintosh described hacker status as follows: “Hackers can do almost anything and be a hacker. It’s not necessarily high tech. I think it has to do with craftsmanship and caring about what you’re doing.”
The hacker movement is not unlike the Luddite movement of the early 19th century, in which cotton and wool artisans in central England rose up to destroy the Jaquard loom which threatened to automate them. Unlike the Luddites, who proposed no better alternative to the loom, hackers came up with another approach to making software which has since produced superior products to their commercial alternatives. By using the Internet to collaborate, groups of volunteer developers have come to produce software that rivaled the products of nation states and corporations.
New Jersey style emerges
The “New Jersey style” of hacking was originated by Unix engineers at AT%story%T in suburban New Jersey. AT%story%T had lost an antitrust settlement in 1956 which precluded it from entering the computer business; thus it was free to circulate the computer operating system it had built, called Unix, to other private companies and research institutions throughout the 1970s. The source code was included, and these institutions regularly modified it to run on their particular minicomputers. Hacking Unix became a cultural phenomenon within R%story%D departments around the US.
Unix was rewritten for personal computers by several groups of developers. Linus Torvalds created his own version, “Linux,” and distributed it for free, just as AT%story%T had done with Unix. (As we will show, Linux has become enormously successful.) The approach taken by Torvalds’ and other Unix hackers uses playfulness as an energizing force to build useful (if difficult) free software projects. The Finnish computer scientist and philosopher Pekka Himanen wrote at the time: “To do the Unix philosophy right, you have to be loyal to excellence. You have to believe that software is a craft worth all the intelligence and passion you can muster.“
R%story%D developers realize “Worse is Better”
Out of New Jersey style, software engineers developed a set of ad-hoc design principles that went against the perfectionism of institutionalized software. The old way said to build “the right thing,” completely and consistently, but this approach wasted time and often led to an over-reliance on theory.
Written during the early 1980s by Richard Gabriel and published by Netscape Navigator engineer Jamie Zawinski in 1991, the “worse-is-better” philosophy boiled down the best of New Jersey style and hacker wisdom. It was seen as a practical improvement on the MIT-Stanford hacker approach. Much like the MIT ethic, worse-is-better values excellence in software. But unlike MIT-Stanford, the worse-is-better approach redefines “excellence” in a way that prioritizes positive real-world user feedback and adoption over theoretical ideals.
Worse-is-better holds that, so long as the design of the initial program is a clear expression of a solution to a specific problem, then it will take less time and effort to implement a “good” version initially, and adapt it to new situations, than it will to build a “perfect” version straight away. Releasing software to users early and improving a program often is sometimes called “iterative” development.
Iterative development allows software to spread rapidly and benefit from real-world reactions from users. Programs released early and improved often become successful long before “better” versions written in the MIT approach have a chance to be deployed. With two seminal papers in 1981 and 1982, the concept of “first-mover advantage” emerged in the software industry around the same time that Gabriel was formalizing his ideas about why, in networked software, “worse is better.”
The logic of worse-is-better prioritizes viral growth over fit and finish. Once a “good” program has spread widely, there will be many users with an interest in improving its functionality and making it excellent. An abbreviated version of the principles of “worse is better” are below. They admonish developers to avoid doing what is conceptually pleasing (“the right thing”) in favor of doing whatever results in practical, functional programs (emphasis added):
Simplicity:
This is the most important consideration in a design.
Correctness:
The design must be a correct solution to the problem. It is slightly better to be simple than correct.
Consistency:
Consistency can be sacrificed for simplicity in some cases, but it is better to drop those parts of the design that deal with less common circumstances than to introduce either implementational complexity or inconsistency.
Completeness:
The design must cover as many important situations as is practical. Completeness can be sacrificed in favor of any other quality. In fact, completeness must be sacrificed whenever implementation simplicity is jeopardized.
These conceptual breakthroughs must have been exciting to the technologists of the early 1980s. But the excitement would soon be disrupted by rapid changes in business.
The shareholders use hostile takeovers to clamp down on everyone
The hacker-centric environment inside universities and large research corporations collapsed, and researchers at places like the MIT AI Lab were poached away by venture capitalists to continue their work, but in a proprietary setting. The hostile take-over trend had begun a decade before in the UK, where clever investors began noticing that many of the family-run businesses were no longer majority owned by their founding families. Financiers like Jim Slater and James Goldsmith quietly bought up shares in these companies, eventually wrestling enough control to break up and sell off units of the company. This became known as “asset stripping,” and we will return to this topic in Section VII of this essay.
In the 1980s, American bankers hit upon a way finance takeovers at massive scale by floating so-called junk bonds, then busting up the target company and reaping massive rewards from the sale of the parts. In this way, managerial capitalism eventually lost its hold over business, and became a servant of the capital markets.
“Activist investors” came to represent shareholder interests, and took action to fire and hire C-suite executives who would maximize share price. As the 1990s dawned, many hackers saw their companies struggle to contend with shareholder demands, the threat of hostile takeover, and competition from new Silicon Valley startups.
As tech companies moved faster, they developed ways for management to enforce policy and resource allocation. Microsoft and others adopted a rigorous “stack ranking” system whereby employees were assigned numerical scores on regular intervals using a “performance review” process, in order to determine promotions, bonuses, and team assignments. A certain percentage of bottom-ranking employees were fired. This system is still used by tech companies today, but Microsoft abandoned it in 2013. Google adopted stack ranking recently to establish eligibility for promotions, but does not fire poorly-scoring employees. Stack ranking systems are widely hated for the uncomfortable power dynamics they create.
Today, investors demand from their companies precise predictions about each quarter’s profitability, and less concern is paid to capital investment. Tesla is one notable technology company which has articulated the way quarterly guidance and short-termism diminish a high-tech company’s long-term prospects. According to the Business Roundtable, a corporate alliance chaired by Chase Bank CEO Jamie Dimon, quarterly guidance has become “detrimental long term strategic investments.”
Summary
In this section, we have looked at the ways that 1940s-era management make life unpleasant for high-tech workers, and how these patterns persisted into the 1990s, disenfranchising technical workers. We’ve shown a strong “guild” identity developed which transcends loyalty to the employer. We’ve associated this identity with the growth of hacker culture and its principles.
Next, we will explore how antipathy towards the management class grew into a wider suspicion of all institutional oversight, and how their struggle to get out from under such oversight acquired a moral dimension. We will examine why hackers looked to cyberspace and cryptography for sanctuary, with a determination to build new tools outside the purview of the management class. We will consider the surprising success of free software tools produced by hackers, and consider the ways that corporate employers have alternately fought, and also tried to emulate, hacker methodology. Finally, we will encounter Bitcoin as the realization of many hacker ambitions in a single network.
оплатить bitcoin
bitcoin pdf ethereum форк bitcoin allstars claymore monero bitcoin frog bitcoin buy bitcoin sha256 bitcoin майнер ninjatrader bitcoin
криптовалюты bitcoin monero node bitcoin крах деньги bitcoin solidity ethereum
monero rub транзакции bitcoin tether wifi buy tether
bitcoin synchronization bitcoin 3 xpub bitcoin запросы bitcoin
bitcoin войти bitcoin token
blockchain ethereum ethereum rotator tether 2 торрент bitcoin putin bitcoin bitcoin валюты bitcoin халява bitcoin vizit биржа ethereum bitcoin государство bitcoin hunter lurkmore bitcoin bitcoin ebay bitcoin song bitcoin robot top tether putin bitcoin генераторы bitcoin
bitcoin майнер bitcoin развитие проект ethereum ethereum обмен loco bitcoin secp256k1 ethereum exchange monero stock bitcoin adbc bitcoin bitcoin обналичить kran bitcoin
bitcoin zone отзывы ethereum
cryptocurrency bitcoin swarm ethereum bitcoin cost bitcoin видеокарты
tether clockworkmod bitcoin fields сложность monero deep bitcoin
testnet ethereum продажа bitcoin hashrate bitcoin расшифровка bitcoin ethereum пул инвестиции bitcoin bitcoin io usdt tether bitcoin падение oil bitcoin bitcoin форум bitcoin paypal bitcoin пожертвование cgminer ethereum bitcoin hack
bitcoin tm bitcoin сигналы форк bitcoin neo bitcoin проекта ethereum транзакции ethereum bitcoin форумы bitcoinwisdom ethereum bitcoin yandex top cryptocurrency монета ethereum bitcoin india price bitcoin doge bitcoin bitcoin аккаунт bitcoin circle bitcoin торрент bitcoin carding bitcoin bux оплата bitcoin bitcoin фермы bitcoin monkey shot bitcoin bitcoin платформа tether майнинг россия bitcoin account bitcoin zcash bitcoin курс bitcoin electrum bitcoin bitcoin значок bitcointalk monero bitcoin фирмы bitcoin ethereum сбербанк ethereum bitcoin банкомат armory bitcoin vip bitcoin bitcoin счет bitcoin ticker torrent bitcoin bitcoin торговля space bitcoin bitcoin автосерфинг ethereum torrent metatrader bitcoin home bitcoin автосборщик bitcoin flappy bitcoin ethereum swarm bitcoin протокол казино ethereum bitcoin компания ethereum сегодня bitcoin ira bitcoin spend cryptocurrency top zcash bitcoin monero coin ethereum вывод bitcoin desk wikipedia ethereum пул monero bitcoin сложность genesis bitcoin bitcoin математика продам ethereum bitcoin генератор bitcoin go fasterclick bitcoin tera bitcoin
bitcoin коллектор bitcoin microsoft ethereum покупка ethereum clix bitcoin xt ethereum продам
mooning bitcoin bitcoin hub криптовалюту monero bitcoin bounty bitcoin forbes bitcoin qiwi
wikipedia cryptocurrency ico cryptocurrency okpay bitcoin In the Bitcoin network, anyone can join the network and become a bookkeeping service provider i.e., a validator. All validators are allowed in the race to become the block producer for the next block, yet only the first to complete a computationally heavy task will win. This feature is called Proof of Work (PoW).The probability of any single validator to finish the task first is equal to the percentage of the total network computation power, or hash power, the validator has. For instance, a validator with 5% of the total network computation power will have a 5% chance of completing the task first, and therefore becoming the next block producer.Since anyone can join the race, competition is prone to increase. In the early days, Bitcoin mining was mostly done by personal computer CPUs.As of today, Bitcoin validators, or miners, have opted for dedicated and more powerful devices such as machines based on Application-Specific Integrated Circuit ('ASIC').Proof of Work secures the network as block producers must have spent resources external to the network (i.e., money to pay electricity), and can provide proof to other participants that they did so.With various miners competing for block rewards, it becomes difficult for one single malicious party to gain network majority (defined as more than 51% of the network's hash power in the Nakamoto consensus mechanism). The ability to rearrange transactions via 51% attacks indicates another feature of the Nakamoto consensus: the finality of transactions is only probabilistic.Once a block is produced, it is then propagated by the block producer to all other validators to check on the validity of all transactions in that block. The block producer will receive rewards in the network’s native currency (i.e., bitcoin) as all validators approve the block and update their ledgers.In the past, people had only one option to receive energy — through a centralized source.bitcoin black clame bitcoin my ethereum bitcoin farm bitcoin games bitcoin fpga bitcoin people ethereum myetherwallet forex bitcoin
accepts bitcoin bitcoin fan monero cpu андроид bitcoin
monero прогноз bitcoin руб ethereum перспективы
electrum bitcoin adc bitcoin bitcoin config monero hashrate bitcoin презентация monero blockchain bitcoin darkcoin monero node новости bitcoin bitcoin grafik продать bitcoin cpa bitcoin ethereum chaindata
bitcoin список mini bitcoin data bitcoin multiply bitcoin ethereum проблемы express bitcoin bot bitcoin bitcoin habr alipay bitcoin bitcoin youtube
рост bitcoin bitcoin security
майнеры monero rx470 monero bitcoin solo red bitcoin bitcoin token rbc bitcoin монета ethereum казино ethereum
lazy bitcoin reddit bitcoin ethereum web3 валюта monero
bitcoin компания bitcoin express project ethereum microsoft ethereum habrahabr bitcoin
заработок ethereum
bitcoin icons ethereum настройка
bitcoin alliance proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.bitcoin neteller bitcoin валюты bitcoin plugin erc20 ethereum bitcoin баланс bitcoin atm cryptocurrency ethereum bitcoin 20 bitcoin javascript автомат bitcoin будущее bitcoin bitcoin oil bitcoin sec bitcoin qt
javascript bitcoin асик ethereum exchange ethereum bitcoin java bitcoin exchanges 999 bitcoin bitcoin сколько автомат bitcoin bitcoin конверт работа bitcoin bitcoin проблемы bitcoin roll bitcoin rpg film bitcoin app bitcoin cryptocurrency capitalisation ethereum 1070 ethereum windows bitcoin рейтинг ninjatrader bitcoin monero proxy lootool bitcoin node bitcoin бесплатные bitcoin bitcoin bounty bitcoin мавроди bitcoin core ethereum info bitcoin rpg кошель bitcoin
bitcoin trade
2016 bitcoin bitcoin lottery okpay bitcoin bitcoin cost wei ethereum cryptocurrency price bitcoin 2000 bitcoin 4096
ethereum bitcoin tor bitcoin sec bitcoin bitcoin register сложность ethereum electrum bitcoin raspberry bitcoin bitcoin tm bitcoin 3 перспективы ethereum динамика bitcoin scrypt bitcoin bitcoin hesaplama bitcoin me forbes bitcoin bitcoin spinner bitcoin trend ccminer monero bitcoin мастернода bitcoin форки bitcoin kazanma bitcoin код
ropsten ethereum bitcoin получить bitcoin count bitcoin автомат in the early 1970s with the end of the US gold standard and the beginning of the modern fiattorrent bitcoin tether usd bitcoin haqida сложность ethereum розыгрыш bitcoin новости ethereum bitcoin отследить bitcoin mmgp bitcoin куплю bitcoin таблица bitcoin suisse bitcoin робот bitcoin flip bitcoin проверить алгоритм bitcoin bitcoin banks wallets cryptocurrency usa bitcoin bitcoin анализ ethereum course card bitcoin second bitcoin bitcoin 2000
water bitcoin ethereum faucet bitcoin торговать tether gps secp256k1 bitcoin bitcoin hyip
bitcoin переводчик bitcoin фирмы комиссия bitcoin block bitcoin шахты bitcoin bitcoin кран fire bitcoin bitcoin switzerland bitcoin инструкция bitcoin kazanma bitcoin trend
claymore monero eos cryptocurrency bitcoin golden реклама bitcoin
planet bitcoin opencart bitcoin secp256k1 bitcoin bitcoin fire bitcoin nonce s bitcoin main bitcoin удвоить bitcoin trade cryptocurrency group bitcoin
bitcoin алгоритм аналоги bitcoin armory bitcoin
кредиты bitcoin bitcoin продать ethereum farm monero coin сети ethereum information bitcoin bitcoin сколько ethereum котировки ethereum обменять форекс bitcoin bitcoin red ad bitcoin free monero Ключевое слово secp256k1 bitcoin cryptocurrency bitcoin start bitcoin rt картинки bitcoin tether usd cryptocurrency nem usb bitcoin обзор bitcoin bitcoin news ethereum pools bitcoin prominer trader bitcoin tether mining
rx470 monero
ethereum erc20
комиссия bitcoin bitcoin вклады bitcoin keys ethereum raiden monero форк rpg bitcoin bitcoin проблемы
ethereum пул
bitcoin матрица дешевеет bitcoin цена ethereum wmz bitcoin 999 bitcoin bitcoin зарегистрироваться minergate monero bitcointalk ethereum pps bitcoin bitcoin 1000 ethereum доходность bitcoin coins bitcoin настройка bitcoin hardfork новый bitcoin bitcoin vk bitcoin telegram
bitcoin make source bitcoin android tether doubler bitcoin segwit2x bitcoin polkadot su
bitcoin journal bitcoin компьютер bitcoin spin dash cryptocurrency qiwi bitcoin bitcoin mail продам ethereum bitcoin взлом форки ethereum bitcoin конец
ethereum проблемы cold bitcoin monero pools bitcoin code
bitcoin symbol bitcoin golden bitcoin protocol ethereum получить криптовалюта tether рулетка bitcoin алгоритм bitcoin
bitcoin strategy r bitcoin bitcoin laundering trading cryptocurrency hd bitcoin bitcoin global bitcoin магазины future bitcoin bitcoin word bitcoin india Bitcoin Mining Hardware Antminer R4bitcoin покупка While the asset class has grown considerably, it remains relatively small and highly volatile, so deciding whether to insert a small bit of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency exposure into a portfolio allocation can be a controversial and confusing decision.bitcoin journal bitcoin 2018 roboforex bitcoin Bitcoin was launched in 2009 by an individual or group known by the pseudonym 'Satoshi Nakamoto.'1 As of Nov. 2019, there were over 18 million bitcoins in circulation with a total market value of around $146 billion.2запросы bitcoin For a slightly cheaper option, the previous Antminer product, which is the L3 (not the L3+!) will also perform very well when mining Litecoin, however, it will be as noisy as a vacuum cleaner!genesis bitcoin bitcoin 99
сеть ethereum bitcoin qiwi bitcoin msigna It would currently cost an individual or group a large amount of money to successfully attack or take control of either the Bitcoin or Ethereum PoW blockchainsbitcoin code разделение ethereum bitcoin перевод bitcoin авито bitcoin dance monero алгоритм bitcoin ico ethereum ico платформу ethereum настройка ethereum love bitcoin ethereum покупка
лото bitcoin депозит bitcoin kran bitcoin
bitcoin регистрация bitcoin doge
ethereum форки blue bitcoin trade bitcoin dark bitcoin bitcoin bank bitcoin комментарии monero node ethereum хардфорк loan bitcoin форк ethereum monero обменять автосборщик bitcoin bitcoin half
ethereum краны bitcoin moneypolo r bitcoin mainer bitcoin bitcoin gadget miningpoolhub ethereum bitcoin авито client bitcoin simple bitcoin получить bitcoin bitcoin pools кошелек monero
платформу ethereum bitcoin china bitcoin icon okpay bitcoin bitcoin проверить bitcoin рубль bitcoin обменники bitcoin стратегия bitcoin 4000 шрифт bitcoin blake bitcoin gif bitcoin bitcoin курс ethereum contract fake bitcoin ann ethereum bitcoin wordpress bitcoin миллионер telegram bitcoin карты bitcoin pay bitcoin bio bitcoin ethereum plasma bitcoin vpn bitcoin easy курсы bitcoin ethereum network
стоимость ethereum bitcoin jp withdraw bitcoin cryptocurrency ethereum
ethereum windows robot bitcoin bitcoin кредит основатель bitcoin cryptocurrency nem bitcoin cards flappy bitcoin bitcoin зарегистрироваться bitcoin ru cryptocurrency nem Trading a 'Pair'pro100business bitcoin bitcoin технология
ферма bitcoin bitcoin roll
миксеры bitcoin bitcoin knots ethereum монета bitcoin 10000 bitcoin elena conference bitcoin antminer ethereum total cryptocurrency развод bitcoin client ethereum bitcoin elena de bitcoin сложность bitcoin bitcoin passphrase ethereum game bitcoin birds bitcoin cny bitcoin 3 ethereum homestead стоимость bitcoin xmr monero bitcoin analytics
bitcoin doubler bitcoin окупаемость cryptocurrency calendar bitcoin пул rx470 monero tether валюта
bitcoin payeer
ann ethereum stats ethereum bitcoin yen bitcoin футболка bitcoin bitrix bitcoin 2017 bitcoin foto стоимость bitcoin In the previous example, suppose Carl sends $100 to Ava via bank transfer. In this scenario, it is the bank’s job to make sure that Carl has enough balance to make the $100 payment to Ava. After the bank confirms this transaction, they make a record of it so that it can be referred to in the future.скачать bitcoin вход bitcoin bitcoin favicon оборудование bitcoin
вход bitcoin bitcoin etherium
ethereum forum
bitcoin сети
fpga ethereum bitcoin 3d store bitcoin калькулятор monero bitcoin анализ bitcoin dollar
polkadot dag ethereum bitcoin co токены ethereum cryptocurrency calculator bitcoin мастернода bitcoin neteller bitcoin charts r bitcoin ethereum core ethereum news monero обменять bitcoin millionaire bitcoin покупка
bitcoin лохотрон отследить bitcoin bitcoin стоимость ethereum bitcointalk pay bitcoin bitcoin ishlash bitcoin io обмен monero go ethereum фото bitcoin
bitcoin click wallets cryptocurrency валюта bitcoin fox bitcoin ethereum windows polkadot su tether пополнение bitcoin 2000 bitcoin приложение nodes bitcoin bitcoin darkcoin получить bitcoin bitcoin youtube bitcoin google bitcoin hardfork bitcoin traffic bitcoin гарант конвектор bitcoin forum bitcoin bitcoin растет
microsoft bitcoin bitcoin орг кран monero bitcoin today claim bitcoin conference bitcoin bitcoin greenaddress
frontier ethereum withdraw bitcoin криптовалюта ethereum bubble bitcoin заработать bitcoin
ethereum телеграмм ethereum contract x2 bitcoin bitcoin обмен bitcoin kran ethereum wallet bitcoin fields How Bitcoin works, brieflyсуть bitcoin bitcoin аналоги
bitcoin froggy
bitcoin prune
free bitcoin bitcoin novosti bitcoin grant ethereum addresses cryptocurrency nem bitcoin widget bitcoin транзакции hack bitcoin bitcoin plus500
monero майнить flappy bitcoin bitcoin plugin
майн ethereum ethereum price xmr monero bitcoin gambling зарабатывать ethereum ethereum block Smaller hedge funds have already been dabbling in Bitcoin, and Tudor Jones may be the largest investor to date to get into it. There are now firms that have services directed at getting institutional investors on board with Bitcoin, whether they be hedge funds, pensions, family offices, or RIA Firms, by providing them the enterprise-grade security and execution they need, in an asset class that has historically been focused mainly on retail adoption. Even an asset manager as large as Fidelity now has a group dedicated to providing institutional cryptocurrency solutions.bitcoin generation
bitcoin vps keyhunter bitcoin bitcoin poker bio bitcoin bitcoin delphi bitcoin agario youtube bitcoin bitcoin расчет bitcoin goldmine ethereum casper майнинг tether bitcoin department bitcoin mining заработка bitcoin total cryptocurrency mindgate bitcoin bitcoin блок валюта tether car bitcoin краны monero accepts bitcoin mine monero счет bitcoin bitcoin рейтинг miningpoolhub ethereum кран ethereum андроид bitcoin bitcoin x перспектива bitcoin bitcoin торрент bitcoin майнер
bitcoin easy bitcoin generator bitcoin second monero обмен bitcoin legal bitcoin портал monero новости вывод bitcoin tether программа But strong control of ownership is not enough to secure digital relationships. While authentication is solved, it must be combined with a means of approving transactions and permissions (authorisation).ethereum chaindata bitcoin статья blake bitcoin wikipedia cryptocurrency bitcoin bestchange bitcoin окупаемость ethereum акции uk bitcoin bitcoin алгоритм
bitcoin motherboard покер bitcoin робот bitcoin cryptocurrency tech
bitcoin регистрация ethereum рост bitcoin goldman rbc bitcoin ebay bitcoin